Відео

No, it doesn't. C-s only searches the current buffer, not all of your buffers, let alone all of your files.

Recent article?

ua-cam.com/video/p4yAB37wG5s/v-deo.html

I might need this piano outro as my common error sound effect on Windows...

This is not EMACS. There is a LEAP key. No control-s is harmed.

@@SimsonGarfinkel Thats why he said ALMOST 🤣

I'm glad you like the book! Would you be interested in a reading list of other amazing HCI books?

@@SimsonGarfinkel I am, What do you recommend?

@@AlejandroGarcia_elviejo I really like "Don't make me think!" and "The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity"

EMACS did have incremental search in the 1970s, but **not between buffers**.

According book of Jef Raskin "Modes are evil and source of mistakes" 🙂 Emacs is less them totally consists of modes

​@@IExSet I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say, but it's true that Emacs has thousands of "modes" while vi/vim seem to only have like five. But in vi/vim these modes are ubiquitous, meaning you always have to mind them no matter if you're writing a novel or source code. That may also be seen as their advantage, though, because you always have them available, and they always work the same. Emacs "modes" on the other hand are very specific to the task at hand. While Raskin may still not approve of that, I think it's much better adhering to his "Rule 1. An interface should be habituating": whether I'm writing Clojure or Python, I'm usually doing just one of these for a given task and can stay in a certain state of mind in which I don't have to constantly remind myself in which mode I am. So I think the meaning of the word "mode" is quite different for vi/vim and Emacs. And it's not like vi/vim doesn't have Emacs style modes, considering the tons of plugins you can use. Hell, even in standard vim it's enough to evoke `:help` to see an example of that. In the end, I think Emacs is the closest thing we have approaching Raskin's vision of having the distinction between applications disappear. Maybe not quite in the way he envisioned it, since I'd probably have a hard time using someone else's Emacs setup, but since it's nowadays so easy to share configuration between computers it's not that big of a problem. Especially for Emacs where everything is text based. When working in Emacs, I don't even have to mind or even be aware anymore if I'm working on a Linux, Windows or Mac computer. (Also true for vim, but the "Applications" I can use vim for are more limited.)

Emacs uses a search mode. That is, you press and release ctrl-s and start typing your search term. Hit ctrl-s again to move to the next hit. Hit ctrl-g to exit the mode. LEAP uses what Raskin called "Semi-Modes" which is... you press (but do not release) the leap forward button, then type your search term (while still holding the leap forward button down.) You exit LEAP mode by releasing the leap forward button. (This is for a forward search. For reverse search replace "ctrl-s" with "ctrl-r" and "leap forward button" with "leap backwards button".) IA & Raskin maintained that the innovation was in the use of the semi-mode. They never claimed to have invented incremental search

It is odd! I think that it's just a filming and editing issue.

There was less competition, but also, there were fewer people who could create quality video productions.

Technology was much more expensive in those days, lots of people couldn't afford computers and PDA's and an entire family shared one computer between them and everyone wasn't walking around with smartphones in their pocket. People were less tech savvy back then as we are nowadays.